I
don't have anything against education. As a matter of fact, if I won
the lottery and didn't have to work anymore, I'd be a professional
student for the rest of my life. I love learning. Some people like
to study very narrow subjects – something like Russian literature.
These might not be very practical degrees to have when you look for a
job but, if you like Russian literature, then go for it. Studying
evolution is sort of like studying Russian literature. No, it's
actually more like studying Big Foot. There's no practical use to
it, really, but if you're interested in pseudo-science, then the
theory of evolution is for you. I won't stop you – not that I
could anyway – but I do object to the way evolution is being taught
in many public schools now.
Several
years ago, I
wrote about a NY Times article that talked about teaching
evolution in the classroom. The article cited a dilemma faced by a
FL biology teacher:
ORANGE
PARK, Fla. — David Campbell switched on the overhead projector and
wrote “Evolution” in the rectangle of light on the screen.
He scanned the faces of the sophomores in his Biology I class. Many of them, he knew from years of teaching high school in this Jacksonville suburb, had been raised to take the biblical creation story as fact. His gaze rested for a moment on Bryce Haas, a football player who attended the 6 a.m. prayer meetings of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes in the school gymnasium.
“If I do this wrong,” Mr. Campbell remembers thinking on that humid spring morning, “I’ll lose him.”
He scanned the faces of the sophomores in his Biology I class. Many of them, he knew from years of teaching high school in this Jacksonville suburb, had been raised to take the biblical creation story as fact. His gaze rested for a moment on Bryce Haas, a football player who attended the 6 a.m. prayer meetings of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes in the school gymnasium.
“If I do this wrong,” Mr. Campbell remembers thinking on that humid spring morning, “I’ll lose him.”
Never
mind the Constitutional concerns for a moment, where a government
employee sees it as his personal mission to rid his students of a
religiously held belief, I'm more interested in this idea that
learning evolution is somehow critical to kids' education. Bill Nye,
my arch-nemesis (at least, my “would be” arch-nemesis,” if he
knew I existed), is on record for saying the following:
[T]here
are more people in the world — another billion people all trying to
use the world’s resources. And the threat and consequences of
climate change are more serious than ever, so we need as many people
engaged in how we’re going to deal with that as possible.... My
biggest concern about creationist kids is that they’re compelled to
suppress their common sense, to suppress their critical thinking
skills at a time in human history when we need them more than
ever.... There are just things about evolution that we should all be
aware of, the way we’re aware of where electricity comes from.
I'm
just puzzled by this idea that a kid can't understand technology or
science unless he believes in evolution. I've seen no evidence,
anywhere, to support the idea that people who believe in creation
suffer academically (except perhaps being discriminated against by
teachers). Furthermore, I've never seen a compelling example of how
a belief in evolution is critical to any other field of study.
I've
linked before to an article
by Dr. Jerry Bergman: a survey of college text books showed that
most barely discuss evolution. The anatomy and physiology text books
examined didn't mention evolution at all. Of the colleges surveyed
in Ohio and Michigan, biology majors were required to only take one
class in evolution. Also from the article, National
Academy of Science Member and renown carbene chemist, Professor
emeritus Dr. Philip Skell of Pennsylvania State University (see
Lewis, 1992), did a survey of his colleagues that were “engaged in
non-historical biology research, related to their ongoing research
projects.” He found that the “Darwinist researchers” he
interviewed, in answer to the question, “Would you have done the
work any differently if you believed Darwin's theory was wrong?”
that “for the large number” of persons he questioned, “differing
only in the amount of hemming and hawing” was “in my work it
would have made no difference.”
If
colleges are supposed to be equipping scientists in their various
fields of research, they must not think evolution is very important,
considering it's barely mentioned. And you can see that even people
who work in biology have admitted that evolution isn't really
relevant to their research. Consider this too: can anyone name a
single invention or technological advance in the last century that
hinged upon an understanding of evolution? Maybe somebody could name
one but that is dwarfed by the virtual explosion of technology we've
seen in the last 100 years that didn't depend on evolution at all!
If
evolution is so ancillary to science, if there is no study linking
understanding evolution to improved test scores, if evolution is
something that kids learn in school but never use again, then why is
there this grim determination that students still must
learn evolution? We're facing an education crisis where kids lack
proficiency in critical skills like reading, math, and history. Why
are we wasting time and resources teaching them a skill that is so
useless yet still so controversial? Why force public schools into
court to defend a sticker in a text book or to remove a teacher who
mentions creation? Let's just stop the controversies altogether.
I'm not saying, “give equal time to creation.” I'm not saying,
“teach the difficulties.” I'm saying stop teaching evolution!