A lot
has already been said about Mr. Savage's remarks and I don't want to
bore anyone by echoing what has already been written on 1,000 other
blogs. Suffice it to say that I agree that Mr. Savage has the right
to say what he said. I also have the right to call him an idiot. In
the arena of free speech, some people say things that will offend
others and Savage pushes offensive speech to the extreme. But if he
couldn't say it, there wouldn't be “free” speech, would there?
I am a
little curious about this venue, though. I've only heard it
described as a “conference” for high school journalists. Are
these public school students? Is this a government sponsored event?
If so, then I most certainly do object to Savage's remarks.
Actually, I object to them in any case but if this is a government
sponsored event, then I object on the grounds of the free exercise
clause in the first amendment. No one would deny that a public
school ordinarily shouldn't bring in anyone who speaks to endorse the
Bible. Neither should they bring in someone who openly criticizes
the Bible. Regardless of that, even if this wasn't a government
sponsored event, I still think the language Savage used was not
appropriate for high school aged students. Many of these young
adults were not old enough to get into an R-rated movie. They didn't
need to be hearing R-rated language. However, this isn't really the
point of my post.
I'm
also a little amused at the irony of the remarks. This alleged
“anti-bullying” hero, in the midst of an “anti-bullying”
speech, proceeds to verbally bully the Bible believing students in
the crowd. Some might say he was simply speaking against those who
would use the Bible as grounds to mistreat gays. Really? Who in the
audience did that? He didn't know if any of them have ever bullied
anyone. It's obvious that his remarks were against all Bible
believing Christians. When those students, not guilty of anything
Savaged alleged, walked out in protest (at least one in tears), he
referred to their protest as a “punk ass move.” It just strikes
me as self-defeating that a person would be so intimidating if his
objective is to persuade people to stop bullying others. However,
this isn't really the point of my post either.
Like
I've already said, I don't want to echo what has already been
discussed elsewhere on the net and other media. There were at least
two things I've not heard being discussed anywhere. First, I was a
little surprised at some of the comments made by people who
criticized the students! I heard more than a few
people say that, if these students are aspiring journalists, they
need to learn to be objective. They shouldn't walk out and refuse to
listen to points of view they might happen to disagree with. I have
to laugh at the insincerity of these critics. I believe the people
who make this point are themselves theophobes who are looking for
still another excuse to ridicule Christians. Like most people who
reject the Bible, they're not rational. They cannot apply their
logic consistently nor have they thought through their position. For
example, what about the students heard on the tape who hooted,
hollered, and applauded Savage's remarks? Where's their objectivity?
If a good journalist shouldn't protest views he disagrees with,
shouldn't he also not cheer wildly views he does agree with? These
amateur critics, who pretend to know what a good journalist should
do, haven't picked up on that point.
This
is sort of an ancillary point but I believe those students who
cheered Savage are representative of the alternative media today. I
heard the other day that CNN's viewership has tanked. Newspapers all
across the nation are folding. Do you know why? It's because these
outlets pretend to report the news objectively but cannot conceal
their seething liberalism. Nobody is interested in hearing their
bias.
The
second thing I noticed about Savage's remarks is the same point I've
raised several times before. He said the Bible is “wrong” on
human sexuality. Such a notion suggests there is some absolute
“right” view of human sexuality. OK, then – where is it? I
ask in earnest. Show me where has been written the absolutely true
and correct standard of sexual conduct. I don't believe such a thing
exists outside of the Bible.
Mr.
Savage speaks as though he has authority on the subject yet he has no
authority beyond his own opinion. And even though many might laud
his opinion, I defy him to lay his finger on some absolute rule that
transcends opinion. Without such a transcendent standard, Mr.
Savage's opinion carries no more weight than my own. As a matter of
fact, my opinion likely carries more weight because mine is the
opinion held by the majority of people. If rights are determined by
the majority, I don't even need to appeal to the Bible to condemn
homosexuality. I could say homosexuality is “wrong” on the
simple grounds that most people think it's “icky.”
Mr.
Savage has retreated a little from his remarks in the wake of the
backlash that followed. However, he will never turn away from his
course. I hope he makes more remarks like this because it will only
shine more light on his error. It's still sad, though. He doesn't
see how wrong he is nor does he know how lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment