So,
Brian Ross, a “reporter” for the alternative news outlet, ABC, is
on the air talking about the CO shooting when he carelessly makes a
tenuous connection between Jim Holmes and the Tea Party. You can see
the irresponsible statements in this video.
There's
something familiar about comments like this. It reminds me of how
evolutionists call creationists, “crack pots.” I've noticed that
whenever fringe nuts commit crimes, there is a usual response among
left-wing “reporters” to quickly blame conservative groups and
radio talk show hosts for inciting the incident with their “hateful
rhetoric.” Do you remember the calls to tone down the rhetoric
after the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Gifford? I recall they blamed
Sarah Palin for having bulls-eyes over certain congressional
districts on her website. The funny thing is that these early,
careless reports always turn out to be wrong. The Jim Holmes who is
a member of the Tea Party is not the same Jim Holmes who murdered a
dozen people in the CO movie theater. The man who shot Rep. Gifford
was not political and likely never even visited Sarah Palin's
website.
But
let's pause for a moment and think about this. What if Holmes really
had been a member of the Tea Party? What does that mean? Does that
suddenly make the Tea Party a terrorist group? Holmes was also once
a PhD student at the University of Colorado. Does that mean the
University of Colorado is a terrorist group? Any attempt to link
Holmes to any conservative group is nothing more than a pitiful,
guilt-by-association argument.
Liberals
should think twice before trying to make a connection between
Holmes' crime and his religious or political associations. I've seen
the pictures and videos of Holmes. I'm not a professional, criminal
profiler or anything but let me tell you what I think about Holmes.
He doesn't strike me as the church-going type. I would guess he's
more likely an atheist or at least he's non-religious. He probably
doesn't vote but, if he does, I would wager that he's registered as a
Democrat. He has not attended any Tea Party rallies but I suspect he's sympathetic to the Occupy Movement (Occupy seems especially popular among young, college students). I'll bet he has expressed concerns over global warming and believes we should raise taxes on the rich. He's not a member of the NRA. He doesn't hunt or fish.
He's not a Ditto Head. I am also 100% sure he is not a young
earth creationist but is, instead, an evolutionist. Does anyone
think I'm wrong on any of these points?
I
think that liberals' attempts to label extremists as “right wing”
are red herrings to move the subject away from the truth – that the
nuts are usually liberals. Oh, by the way, I did a search of Obama
donors and found that there was a James Holmes who gave to Obama's campaign in
2008. Now, I'm not sure if this is the same Jim Holmes who committed the shootings but....
No comments:
Post a Comment